Striking
the Balance in Food Labels
After our discussion with Professor Goldstein about food
labels, the question occurred to me: how much labeling is too much labeling?
Our class conversation concerned recent food labeling laws
surrounding GMOs. While
food labeling in the past was generally confined to food safety and nutritional
content, consumers today are concerned about more than these two factors. In
the age of “voting with your fork,” people are realizing that they can have an
impact on the food industry and production processes simply by their food
choices.
The ethical implications of modern-day food production has
certainly come to the forefront. Consumers are thus responding by attempting to
choose foods produced by methods with fewer harmful consequences for animal
welfare, labor, and the environment. From Leah’s Eating Animals discussion
about farm animal conditions to Professor Goldstein’s environmental concerns
from pesticides to climate change to manure pollution, labeling plays an
important role of progress in the food industry.
Still, while these new ethical labels serve an important
role, increased labeling, whether for nutrition content or procution process,
also comes with risks. Too
much information in food labels dilutes the messaging and can distract from the
some of the more important nutritional content labels. For some consumers, more
information can cause them to lose interest in food labels altogether. Concerns
already exist that consumers are not paying attention to labels or
understanding their content. Increased food labeling plays a role in the
scientism of food, complicating food choices even further for already confused
consumers. When one of the core messages of our class is to eat simple,
wholesome food in its natural form, the obsession with food labels opposes this
teaching.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, increased food labeling
can cause people to obsess over food content and encourage orthorexia. f
messages about quality or health associated with labels become overemphasized,
the high cost of culture can kick in, where people act against their economic
best interests to maintain high food standards. Especially when GMO’s have not
been proven to have any adverse health effects and ambiguous environmental
safety effects, the labeling requirements may not be as helpful as anticipated.
Nevertheless, food
labeling is important for building trust between the consumer and manufacturer.
It adheres to the idea of people’s right
to know what they are eating. Certainly there is a reason to add new labels
regarding better nutritional and ethical visibility, however it may be
important to recognize the downside to labeling as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment